Gluco Cleanse Tea Ingredients: All 19 the Seller Names, and the One Number None of Them Carries

Gluco Cleanse Tea names 19 botanicals plus a lemon and mint flavor. The seller publishes no amount for any of the 19 and no Supplement Facts panel. The formula contains no chromium or other mineral.

The sales page heads its ingredient section with this line: "Inside Each Bag, You Get The Synergy Of These 19 Diabetes Fixing Ingredients". That's the seller's wording. We report it. We don't endorse it.

Under that heading sit 20 items. Nineteen are botanicals. The last is a natural lemon and mint flavor.

Here's the part that matters most. We read the page on 29 September 2026, and there's no Supplement Facts panel anywhere on it. That isn't a proprietary blend with a hidden split. There's no panel at all.

The sales page text gives no weight for any ingredient, no net weight and no serving count. The pouch photograph does print a total weight and a tea bag count. The next section covers both.

No weight for any single ingredient appears anywhere. Every claim below comes with the same missing number.

For each ingredient we give the seller's own claim in quotes. Then we give what's known. For the research we counted randomized controlled trial records in Europe PMC, on the same date.

A count shows how much human research exists on a plant. It isn't a verdict, and it isn't evidence about this tea. Europe PMC returns 0 records for Gluco Cleanse Tea itself.

The seller publishes no panel, but the front of the pouch is readable. We took its text from the seller's own product photograph on 29 September 2026. Anyone can open the same image and read the same text.

The count and weight. The pouch prints "30 TEA BAGS" and "Net Wt 4.25 oz (60 gr)". So a total weight now exists, even though no per-ingredient amount does.

Sixty grams over 30 tea bags is exactly 2 g a bag. Nineteen botanicals and a flavor share those 2 g.

That's a small tea bag for so long a list. Each herb gets a sliver, unless a few dominate and the rest are traces. The pouch doesn't say which.

Say the split were even. Each botanical would get about 105 mg a bag. That's our assumption, and the seller states no split at all.

The two printed units disagree, because 4.25 oz is 120 g. That's an error on the label, and a photograph can't tell us which figure is right. The tea bag count is printed separately and plainly.

The six claims. Each one printed on the pouch carries an asterisk.

• "Supports Healthy Blood Sugar Levels*"
• "Promotes Pancreatic Health*"
• "Helps In Weight Loss*"
• "Helps Boost Metabolism*"
• "Helps Reduce Appetite & Cravings*"
• "Promotes Healthy Energy*"

These are ordinary structure and function claims. The pouch never says the tea fixes, cures or reverses anything.

The sales page goes much further. It says the tea "Reignites Your Pancreas" and promises to "FIX Your Type 2 Diabetes". The pouch says only "Promotes Pancreatic Health*".

So the pouch is labeled conservatively, while the sales page claims to fix a disease. The gap sits between the marketing and the product.

Here are the nineteen botanicals the seller names, plus the flavoring. Every picture below is a freely licensed photograph of the named plant.

Look at the grid and you can see the problem in one go. Nineteen plants is a lot of plants. None of them carries a number.

Photographs are of the named species, not of this product. We use freely licensed images rather than the seller's own stock photography. Credits: Gymnema Sylvestre by Vinayaraj, CC BY-SA 3.0; Triphala by Lalithamba, CC BY 2.0; Bitter melon by Joydeep, CC BY-SA 3.0; White mulberry leaves by Andre Abrahami, CC BY-SA 2.5; Cinnamon by Luc Viatour, CC BY-SA 3.0; Turmeric by Simon A. Eugster, CC BY-SA 3.0; Fenugreek seeds by Humbads, Public domain; Banaba leaves by Vinayaraj, CC BY-SA 3.0; Juniper berries by Scoo, CC BY 2.5; Green tea by Vinayaraj, CC BY-SA 4.0; Oolong tea by Iateasquirrel, CC BY-SA 3.0; Orange peel by Sten Porse, CC BY-SA 3.0; Lemongrass by a Wikimedia Commons contributor, CC BY 2.0; Ginger by H. Zell, CC BY-SA 3.0; Dandelion leaves by Kate Jewell, CC BY-SA 2.0; Ginseng root by Ginsenosideforbrain, CC BY-SA 3.0; Garcinia Cambogia by Vijayanrajapuram, CC BY-SA 4.0; Peppermint by Rillke, CC BY-SA 3.0; Monk fruit by Kanashimi, CC BY-SA 3.0.

1. Gymnema sylvestre. The seller says: "Helps regenerate insulin-producing beta cells in your pancreas." Europe PMC lists 17 randomized trials on the plant. A search for gymnema, beta cells and humans, limited to randomized trials, returned 0 records.

2. Triphala. The seller says: "Reduces blood sugar levels and oxidative stress." Europe PMC lists 5 randomized trials on triphala with diabetes or glucose. That's a small base.

3. Bitter melon. The seller says: "Acts like a 'natural insulin' and helps lower blood glucose levels." Europe PMC lists 32 trials. A 2024 meta-analysis found "significant reductions in fasting blood glucose (FBG) and glycosylated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c)" in type 2 diabetes (PMID 38784554).

4. White mulberry leaves. The seller says: "Prevents sudden spikes after meals by slowing down sugar's digestion." Europe PMC lists 134 randomized trials. We hold the count only, so we make no claim on the results.

5. Cinnamon. The seller says: "Significantly reduces blood sugar and improves insulin sensitivity." Europe PMC lists 76 trials in type 2 diabetes. Cochrane found the fasting glucose effect inconclusive (PMID 22972104). Details are on the does-it-work page.

6. Turmeric. The seller says: "Reduces inflammation associated with diabetes." Our research file holds no trial count for turmeric. We make no claim either way.

7. Fenugreek seeds. The seller says: "Reduce blood sugar absorption." Europe PMC lists 430 trials, the largest count here. A 2024 meta-analysis found HbA1c fell 0.54 percentage points (PMID 39286181). A 2025 review found fasting glucose fell 16.75 mg/dL (PMID 41509111).

8. Banaba leaves. The seller says: "Helps transport sugar into cells, stabilizing blood sugar levels." Europe PMC lists 11 randomized trials, counting banaba and corosolic acid.

9. Juniper berries. The seller says: "Contain antioxidant-rich compounds that regulate blood sugar." Europe PMC lists 5 randomized trials on juniper with diabetes or glucose.

10. Green tea. The seller says: "Helps boost your metabolism and break down fat cells." No trial count on file.

11. Oolong tea. The seller says: "Accelerates the fat burning process especially in the abdominal area." No trial count on file. Our product record gives it the same Latin name as green tea, Camellia sinensis.

12. Orange peel. The seller says: "Promotes fulness and helps in weight loss." No trial count on file.

13. Lemongrass. The seller says: "Helps reduce water weight and aids digestion." No trial count on file.

14. Ginger. The seller says: "Boosts your metabolism and energy levels and reduces cravings for sugar." No trial count on file.

15. Dandelion leaves. The seller says: "Helps shed water weight and detoxifies the body." No trial count on file.

16. Ginseng root. The seller says: "Increases energy levels and boosts metabolism while improving sexual performance." No trial count on file.

17. Garcinia cambogia. The seller says: "Suppresses appetite and blocks fat production." Europe PMC lists 50 randomized trials on garcinia and hydroxycitric acid.

18. Peppermint. The seller says: "Aids digestion, reduces fatigue and improves sleep quality." No trial count on file.

19. Monk fruit. The seller says: "Zero-calorie natural sweetener that doesn't increase blood sugar." No trial count on file.

The flavor. The seller says: "To enhance the taste and make it yummy." It's listed as a natural lemon and mint flavor. No source is named.

"No trial count on file" means we didn't search those ten. It doesn't mean nothing exists. It means we won't guess.

The last column is the spine of this page. Twenty rows, and every one reads "None".

Bing's AI answer on the head review query says the formula includes "Chromium picolinate ... for insulin sensitivity". The answer cites pvmedcenter.com.

That's wrong. Chromium picolinate isn't on the seller's list. The list holds 19 botanicals and a flavor. It has no mineral of any kind.

The same answer says exact dosages are withheld "due to a proprietary blend". That's wrong too. The seller doesn't publish a proprietary blend. It publishes no panel, so there's no blend to hide behind.

We read two labels on nowfoods.com on 29 September 2026. We name them for what they state. They aren't recommendations, and we haven't tested them.

NOW Cinnamon Bark 600 mg states "Cinnamon bark 1.2 g (1,200 mg) per 2-capsule serving". Two servings reach the 2 g that Cochrane's trials used. The price is $11.99 for 60 servings.

NOW Fenugreek 500 mg states "Organic fenugreek seed 1 g (1,000 mg) per 2-capsule serving". Its label also says not recommended for pregnant women. The tea's page carries no such line.

You can hold either label against a trial. You can't do that with this tea.

For the trials themselves, read does Gluco Cleanse Tea work. For the full verdict, see our review. Interactions with diabetes medicine are on the side effects page. Costs are on the price page.

This page is desk analysis. We read the seller's sales page and pouch photograph on 29 September 2026. We queried Europe PMC the same day. We didn't test the product. If a fact changes, tell us through the contact page. We'll correct it with a dated note.

That link goes to the seller's own site. We earn a commission if you buy, at no extra cost to you, and it never changes what we write. Our full review has the score and the verdict.

This page is information, not medical advice. Statements about supplements have not been evaluated by the FDA.