SugarReset Ingredients: Twenty-Three Declared, and Only Two Amounts Anywhere

SugarReset's label declares twenty-three ingredients. It gives two amounts. Chromium at 0.7 mcg, and a blend at 200 mg. Twenty-two ingredients share that 200 mg.

We read the seller's page, forsugarreset.com, on 10 October 2026. It says the formula "combines a selection of 5 vital nutrients found in nature."

The page then describes six ingredients by name. The label artwork declares twenty-three.

Only two of those carry an amount. Chromium has 0.7 mcg, and one proprietary blend has 200 mg.

The other twenty-two sit inside that blend with no amount of their own.

This page is desk analysis, and we haven't tested SugarReset. Below you'll find the label, the blend, who published the amounts first, and how the trial doses compare.

The label appears once, as a 1200 by 600 pixel artwork near the foot of the sales page. We read it at full resolution.

Nothing in the sales copy repeats a single figure from it.

The front of the label reads "SUGAR RESET" and "Promotes Metabolic Balance". It also reads "Dietary Supplement" and "1 fl oz / 30 ml".

It also prints "Made in the USA with globally sourced ingredients." No facility is named. Neither is a GMP certificate or a third-party test.

A "Scientific References" heading sits in the footer with nothing under it. There's no PubMed link, no journal and no study. That's zero references.

The directions read "Shake well before each use. Take 1 or 2 droppers full daily. Place in mouth and swallow." Serving size is 1 ml, and the label gives 30 servings per container.

We found two amounts on the label and none in the sales copy. Here they are.

The label puts chromium's 0.7 mcg at 2% of the Daily Value.

Chromium is the one nutrient the label declares on its own. Everything else hides inside the blend.

Twenty-two ingredients share a single proprietary blend of 200 mg. The label gives the total and no individual amounts.

Chromium plus the twenty-two blend items makes twenty-three. That's the full declared count.

Split evenly, 200 mg across twenty-two items is about 9.1 mg each. The label doesn't say the split is even.

The label also lists other ingredients. They are glycerin, water, organic lemon extract and stevia extract 97% (Reb-A).

The rest are xylitol, sodium benzoate, potassium sorbate, citric acid and natural flavors.

nohypewellness.com and health-product-review.com both published the 0.7 mcg chromium figure and the 200 mg blend before us.

nohypewellness.com also published the twenty-three item count. It spotted the aerial versus root problem on ginseng too.

We credit both sites by name. The discovery isn't ours.

Our part is narrower. We read the label artwork on the seller's own page, then set each amount beside the trial doses.

Every trial dose here is larger than anything the label allows for that ingredient.

Chromium first. PMID 9356027 randomized 180 adults treated for type 2 diabetes. They got placebo, 200 mcg or 1,000 mcg a day.

HbA1c improved at two months on 1,000 mcg and in both chromium arms by four months. The label's 0.7 mcg is 286 times below the lower arm.

It's 1,429 times below the higher arm.

Gymnema next. PMID 2259217 added a leaf extract to oral drugs in type 2 diabetes. The dose was 400 mg a day for 18 to 20 months. Blood glucose and HbA1c fell.

That one dose is twice the entire 200 mg blend. The seller calls gymnema the sugar destroyer and says it helps regenerate pancreatic cells.

African mango. PMID 19254366 gave overweight and obese volunteers 300 mg a day for ten weeks. Several blood markers improved against placebo. The dose alone exceeds the whole blend.

Green tea. PMID 25230741 used 615 mg of catechins a day for four weeks, and postprandial glucose and insulin improved. That's three times the whole blend.

Now the fair counterweight. PMID 32670385 is a 2020 meta-analysis. It found green tea at proper catechin doses cut fasting blood glucose by 1.44 mg/dL.

The confidence interval ran from 2.26 to 0.62. Small either way, even at full dose.

We aren't saying the blend does nothing. We're saying the label gives you no way to check, and the seller lists no references.

The label declares "Panax Ginseng Aerial Extract." The seller calls ginseng an ancient root. It says the root improves glucose uptake by muscle cells.

Aerial parts are leaves and stems. They aren't the root.

The ginseng trial we found, PMID 29478187, tested American ginseng root extract. It was a double-blind cross-over in type 2 diabetes lasting eight weeks.

Glycemic control and some cardiovascular risk markers improved at 1 g per meal, 3 g a day.

That dose is fifteen times the whole 200 mg blend. The plant part differs as well.

So the seller describes one part of the plant and the label declares another. nohypewellness.com raised this first.

The seller calls maca an adaptogen that balances hormones and the stress response.

We searched Europe PMC on 10 October 2026 for Lepidium meyenii. We wanted a glucose, blood sugar or glycemic outcome. It returned no randomized or double-blind trial.

Silence in one database isn't proof that maca does nothing. We just have no trial to show you.

Maca has no published amount either. It's one of twenty-two items sharing the 200 mg.

The page says the formula combines 5 vital nutrients. It then describes six ingredients. The label declares twenty-three.

Only one of them is a nutrient with a declared amount, and that's chromium.

The other ingredients get no description at all. A shopper reading only the sales copy would miss most of the blend.

We aren't claiming the errors change what's in the bottle. They suggest the artwork wasn't proofread closely.

That matters here because the label is the only document the seller gives you.

For the verdict and score, read our SugarReset review. The does-it-work page covers the trials behind each ingredient. The side-effects page covers the label warnings.

Blood sugar is a medical matter. Talk to your doctor before adding anything, and never change a prescribed medicine on your own.

Nothing here treats or prevents diabetes. If your doctor prescribed a medicine, follow that rather than substituting a supplement.

This page is desk analysis, and we haven't tested SugarReset. We read the seller's pages, the label artwork and Europe PMC on 10 October 2026. If something changes, tell us through the contact page and we'll add a dated correction.

That link goes to the seller's own site. We earn a commission if you buy, at no extra cost to you, and it never changes what we write. Our full review has the score and the verdict.

This page is information, not medical advice. Statements about supplements have not been evaluated by the FDA.