SugarReset Review: A 200 mg Blend Split Twenty-Two Ways, and 0.7 mcg of Chromium
The label is published, and that is the problem. Read it next to the trials and the gap is not close.
Checked 10 October 2026. Label and price figures checked 10 October 2026. Every source is named below, so you can repeat each check yourself.
What SugarReset gets right, and where it falls down
Every line below is checked against the seller's own pages, read 10 October 2026.
In its favour
- A published label with a checkable chromium figure.
- No customer counter and no bottles-left counter.
- Correct per-bottle sums, and an order page whose savings add up.
- Ingredients with real trials behind them.
- Free US shipping on the three and six bottle packs.
Against it
- Chromium sits 286 times under the trial's lower arm.
- 22 ingredients share 200 mg with no amount for any of them.
- The refund window runs from day 30 to day 60. The page is silent on shipping and return postage.
- The main page's saving is $21, not $200, and the bottle size differs between pictures.
What we found when we checked SugarReset
Checked against its own sales page, its own order page and the trials it leans on
SugarReset is a liquid blood-sugar supplement sold in a dropper bottle through BuyGoods. Packs run from $158 for two bottles to $294 for six. The label declares chromium at 0.7 mcg. The chromium trial we found used 200 to 1,000 mcg. We score it 2 out of 10.
We landed on 2 out of 10, checked 10 October 2026. The label is published, and that's the problem. It declares 0.7 mcg of chromium where the trial used 200 to 1,000 mcg. The other 22 ingredients share one 200 mg blend with no amounts. Publishing a panel earns its only two points. Most sellers here don't publish one.
We read the sales page and the order page on 10 October 2026.
We read the Supplement Facts artwork on the seller's own page at full resolution.
Every study we cite has a PMID and was found through Europe PMC.
We searched Bing US for the official site on 10 October 2026.
SugarReset scores 2 out of 10. Its own label declares chromium at 0.7 mcg, where trials used 200 to 1,000 mcg. The other 22 ingredients share one 200 mg blend with no amounts. Packs cost $158 to $294, and the 60 day guarantee opens on day 30.
Disclosure: we may earn a commission if you buy through a link on this page. You pay the same price either way. The commission doesn't change our score.
What is SugarReset, and who actually sells it?
A liquid, a 30 ml dropper bottle and a type 2 pitch
SugarReset is a liquid. The label says to take 1 or 2 droppers full daily. Place it in the mouth and swallow.
One serving is 1 ml. A bottle holds 30 servings, so one bottle lasts 30 days at one dropper. We read that off the label artwork on the seller's page.
The front of the bottle reads "SUGAR RESET" and "Promotes Metabolic Balance". It also reads "Dietary Supplement" and "1 fl oz / 30 ml". The label adds "Made in the USA with globally sourced ingredients".
No facility, GMP certificate or third-party test is named anywhere. We looked on the page and on the label.
The seller's site is forsugarreset.com. BuyGoods is the retailer, with an address in Wilmington, Delaware. Support is contact@customercs.com. The page doesn't publish a returns warehouse.
The distributor line on the label is small and only partly legible. At full size it appears to read Instituto Experience.
The headline reads "Finally, The Easiest Way to Manage Type 2 for a Healthier, More Energetic Life". The page also says the formula "combines a selection of 5 vital nutrients".
Its list of claims runs from "Promote Healthy Insulin Function" to "Assist in Maintaining a Healthy Weight". Those are the seller's words, not ours.
The disclaimer says the product isn't intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any disease. Hold the headline and the disclaimer side by side.
| Detail | What the page and label say |
|---|---|
| Form | Liquid, dropper bottle, 1 fl oz / 30 ml |
| Serving size | 1 ml |
| Servings per bottle | 30 |
| Directions | 1 or 2 droppers full daily, place in mouth and swallow |
| Ingredients declared | 23, which is chromium plus a 22-item blend |
| Amounts printed | Chromium 0.7 mcg and the blend, 200 mg |
| Other ingredients | Glycerin, water, organic lemon extract, stevia extract 97% (Reb-A), xylitol, sodium benzoate, potassium sorbate, citric acid, natural flavors |
| Seller site | forsugarreset.com |
| Retailer | BuyGoods, Wilmington, Delaware |
| Support | contact@customercs.com |
Our ingredients page lists all twenty-three.
What the seller does get right
A few real credits, set down before the problems
SugarReset earned a few real credits. Here they are, in the order we found them.
The label is published. The seller shows a Supplement Facts label as artwork near the foot of its page. We could read the numbers because it did. Nothing in the sales copy repeats a single figure from it.
One amount is checkable. Chromium is declared on its own at 0.7 mcg, as chromium picolinate. That's 2% of the Daily Value. It's the number this review turns on.
No customer counter, no bottles-left counter. The page doesn't claim a running count of buyers or a stock level. It does carry a countdown timer, which we cover below.
The disclaimers are printed. The page carries the FDA statement. It also says testimonials "may not reflect the typical buyer's experience".
The per-bottle sums are right. We multiplied each bottle price by the bottle count. All three packs add up.
| Per bottle | Our sum | Page total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 bottles | $79 | 2 x 79 = $158 | $158 |
| 3 bottles | $69 | 3 x 69 = $207 | $207 |
| 6 bottles | $49 | 6 x 49 = $294 | $294 |
The order page's savings add up. Measured against its own crossed-out prices, all three stated savings are right. The main page is a different story, and we cover it below.
The ingredient picks are real. Chromium, gymnema, African mango, green tea and ginseng each have a published trial. The seller didn't invent them. The trouble is the dose.
Free US shipping on the three and six bottle packs. Only the two-bottle pack pays shipping, at $9.99.
Next, what holds the score down.
The six ingredients the seller names, and the research behind each
Twenty-three declared, one amount printed, and a claim for six
The page says five nutrients, then describes six by name. The label declares twenty-three. The only ingredient with its own amount is chromium.
Below are the six the page leans on. What each card says the seller claims is the seller's, not ours. The research is what we found in Europe PMC on 10 October 2026.
The seller calls it a key that helps insulin enter your cells. A 1997 trial in Diabetes (PMID 9356027) randomised 180 adults treated for type 2 diabetes. They took placebo, 200 mcg or 1,000 mcg a day for four months. HbA1c improved in both chromium arms by month four.
The seller calls it the sugar destroyer and says it helps regenerate pancreatic cells. A 1990 trial (PMID 2259217) added a leaf extract to conventional oral drugs for 18 to 20 months. The dose was 400 mg a day. Blood glucose and HbA1c fell.
The seller says it acts on leptin and helps the body process fats and sugars. A 2009 trial (PMID 19254366) ran ten weeks in overweight and obese volunteers. The dose was 150 mg twice daily. Weight, waist and several blood markers beat placebo.
The seller says its catechins improve the cells' sensitivity to insulin. A 2014 trial (PMID 25230741) gave a catechin-rich beverage for four weeks. Postprandial glucose and insulin improved against a low-catechin placebo. The dose was 615 mg of catechins a day.
The seller calls it an ancient root that improves glucose uptake by muscle cells. A 2019 double-blind cross-over (PMID 29478187) gave type 2 patients American ginseng extract for eight weeks. The dose was 3 g a day. We take it up in its own section below.
The seller calls it an adaptogen that balances hormones and the stress response. Europe PMC returned no randomised blood-sugar trial for maca when we searched on 10 October 2026. The claim has no trial behind it that we could find.
The rest of the blend comes in two runs of names. Next come grape seed, guarana, eleuthero, astragalus, Coleus forskohlii, cayenne, grapefruit, raspberry ketones and licorice extract. Then L-glutamine, L-tyrosine, L-arginine, beta-alanine, GABA, L-ornithine, L-tryptophan and L-carnitine. The page makes no claim for them and the label gives no amount.
A trial result belongs to the dose the trial used. This label doesn't say what dose is in the bottle. The next section sets the two side by side.
How do SugarReset's doses compare with the trials?
Every trial dose we found is bigger than the entire blend
This is where the review turns. It's a comparison you can repeat yourself.
Take the dose each trial used. Then look at what the label declares. The whole blend weighs 200 mg, and every herb in it shares that weight.
| Ingredient | Trial | Trial dose | SugarReset label |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chromium | PMID 9356027, 180 adults, four months | 200 to 1,000 mcg a day | 0.7 mcg |
| Gymnema | PMID 2259217, leaf extract, 18 to 20 months | 400 mg a day | Inside the 200 mg blend, no amount |
| African mango | PMID 19254366, ten weeks | 300 mg a day | Inside the 200 mg blend, no amount |
| Green tea | PMID 25230741, four weeks | 615 mg catechins a day | Inside the 200 mg blend, no amount |
| Ginseng | PMID 29478187, eight weeks, American ginseng root | 3,000 mg a day | Aerial extract inside the 200 mg blend, no amount |
| Maca | No randomised blood-sugar trial found | None to compare | Inside the 200 mg blend, no amount |
Start with chromium, because it's the one number the label gives. The trial's low arm was 200 mcg. The label declares 0.7 mcg. That's 286 times less.
Against the trial's high arm of 1,000 mcg, the gap is 1,429 times. The caveat sits in the numbers. SugarReset declares a 286th of the lower arm.
Now the herbs. Each trial dose is bigger than the whole blend. Gymnema's 400 mg is twice the entire 200 mg. African mango's 300 mg is more than the entire blend.
Green tea's 615 mg of catechins is three times the whole blend. Ginseng's 3,000 mg is fifteen times it. And the blend isn't one herb. It's 22 ingredients.
A second gymnema trial (PMID 2259216) used the same 400 mg. It enrolled 27 people with insulin-dependent diabetes. That's type 1, so it says nothing about the audience this product addresses.
How close a SugarReset serving gets to each trial dose
Each bar shows the whole 200 mg blend as a share of the trial dose. Chromium shows its own 0.7 mcg. A shorter bar sits further under the trial. Real shares are smaller, because 22 ingredients split the blend.
Trial doses come from the papers named in the table above. The seller cites no study of its own.
So the label can't reach the doses the trials used. That's a plain reading of two numbers on the same page. It isn't a claim that the herbs do nothing.
It does mean you can't lean on those trials to judge this bottle. A trial result belongs to the dose the trial used.
What is hiding inside the 200 mg blend?
Twenty-two ingredients, one weight and no split
The label gives one weight for the blend. It's 200 mg. It lists 22 ingredients under that weight and gives none of them an amount.
| Item | Amount on the label | Note |
|---|---|---|
| Chromium, as chromium picolinate | 0.7 mcg | 2% of the Daily Value |
| Proprietary blend of 22 ingredients | 200 mg | No amount for any single ingredient |
Split evenly, each of the 22 would get about 9 mg. A real split won't be even. Some ingredients get more and some get less.
Only the seller knows the split. The label doesn't print it, and the sales page doesn't either.
Chromium sits outside the blend. Everything else, from maca to L-carnitine, shares the 200 mg.
Look at what that does to the named herbs. Gymnema's trial dose was 400 mg a day. Even if gymnema were the entire blend, one serving would hold half of it.
The label also misspells three names. It prints "Lepidium mevenii" for meyenii, "Irvingia gabonesis" for gabonensis and "L-Typtophan" for L-Tryptophan.
Who published the 0.7 mcg chromium figure first?
Two other sites did, and they deserve the credit
We didn't find the 0.7 mcg figure first. nohypewellness.com and health-product-review.com both published the 0.7 mcg chromium amount and the 200 mg blend before us.
nohypewellness.com also published the twenty-three item count. It spotted the aerial versus root problem with the ginseng too.
We read the same label artwork ourselves at full resolution on 10 October 2026. Our figures match theirs. If you want a second read, start with those two sites.
What we add is the comparison with the trials, ingredient by ingredient. We also add five points taken from the seller's own pages, which follow.
As far as we found, neither site covers four points. Those are the guarantee window, the two crossed-out prices, the supply maths and the two bottle sizes. The twenty-three count is theirs first.
Green tea works a little, and we say so
A real effect, and a small one
We don't want to overstate this review. Green tea has support, and it should get a fair hearing.
A 2020 systematic review and meta-analysis in Nutrition and Metabolism (PMID 32670385) pooled the trials. At proper catechin doses, fasting blood glucose fell by 1.44 mg/dL.
The 95% confidence interval ran from 2.26 to 0.62 mg/dL lower. It doesn't cross zero, so the effect is real. It's also small, about one and a half mg/dL.
Now put that beside the bottle. The pooled effect comes from proper catechin doses. The 2014 trial used 615 mg of catechins a day.
The whole SugarReset blend weighs 200 mg. Catechins can't weigh more than the blend that holds them. So the label can't reach those doses.
Small at the proper dose, and smaller still at an unknown share of 200 mg. That's the honest size of the green tea claim.
Ginseng leaves where the trials used root
Aerial extract on the label, "an ancient root" on the page
The label declares "Panax Ginseng Aerial Extract". The sales page calls the same ingredient "an ancient root". Aerial parts are leaves and stems.
The ginseng trial used root. PMID 29478187 was a double-blind cross-over in type 2 diabetes, run for eight weeks. It gave American ginseng extract, 1 g per meal, 3 g a day.
Glycaemic control improved, along with some cardiovascular risk markers. That's a real result. It belongs to root at 3 g a day.
Three grams is fifteen times the whole 200 mg blend. The trial species was American ginseng and the part was root. The label names Panax and the part is leaf and stem.
nohypewellness.com raised the aerial versus root point before us, and we agree with it.
Maca gets the same treatment. The seller credits it with balancing hormones and the stress response. Europe PMC returned no randomised or double-blind maca trial with a glucose, blood sugar or glycaemic outcome. We searched on 10 October 2026.
An empty search isn't a verdict. It does mean the claim has nothing published for us to check.
What does the 60-day SugarReset guarantee cover?
A badge that says sixty days and a clause that says thirty
Every pack card carries the badge "60 DAYS GUARANTEE". The body text says more.
It reads: "backed by a 60-day money-back guarantee from the date of purchase. If, after at least 30 days of use, you are not completely satisfied with your results, the product, or your overall experience, simply contact us".
Read the second sentence again. You must use the product for at least 30 days first. So the window runs from day 30 to day 60.
The page doesn't say whether the $9.99 shipping on the two-bottle pack comes back. It doesn't say whether you must return every bottle. It doesn't say who pays return postage.
Then there's the length of the course. The seller sells a 90 day supply and a 180 day supply. Both outlast the guarantee.
| Days of supply | Window opens | Window closes | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 bottles | 60 | Day 30 | Day 60 |
| 3 bottles | 90 | Day 30 | Day 60 |
| 6 bottles | 180 | Day 30 | Day 60 |
The page pushes the six-bottle pack hardest. It also claims "96% Of Customers Orders 6 Bottles" and gives no source. We haven't requested a refund. Our complaints page covers what buyers report.
Two pages, two crossed-out prices, one $200 saving
The same two-bottle pack, struck through at $358 and at $179
The seller's order page strikes through $358 for the two-bottle pack. The main site strikes through $179 for the same pack. Both claim "YOU SAVE $200".
Only one of those can be right. $358 minus $158 is $200. $179 minus $158 is $21.
| Pack and page | Crossed out | You pay | Saving the sum gives | Saving the page claims |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 bottles, order page | $358 | $158 | $200 | $200 |
| 3 bottles, order page | $537 | $207 | $330 | $330 |
| 6 bottles, order page | $1,074 | $294 | $780 | $780 |
| 2 bottles, main page | $179 | $158 | $21 | $200 |
The order page adds up against its own numbers. The main page doesn't. It strikes through $179 and still claims $200 off.
There's a deeper problem. Every saving is measured from $179 a bottle. That price isn't for sale anywhere on the site.
The cheapest bottle you can actually buy is $49, in the six-bottle pack. The crossed-out figure is a reference nobody can order at. We read both pages on 10 October 2026.
The two-bottle pack also costs more than its card says. With $9.99 shipping, the door price is $167.99. Our price page sets out each pack in full.
Does a two-bottle pack last 60 days?
Only at the lower of two doses the label allows
The two-bottle card says "60 Day Supply". The label says 30 servings a bottle. Its directions say to take 1 or 2 droppers full daily.
At one dropper, a bottle lasts 30 days. Two bottles are the 60 days the card promises.
At two droppers, a bottle lasts 15 days. The same two bottles are a 30 day supply.
| Days a bottle lasts | Days two bottles last | What the card says | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 dropper a day | 30 | 60 | 60 Day Supply |
| 2 droppers a day | 15 | 30 | 60 Day Supply |
Only the lower dose matches the supply the cards print. The label allows both.
Every cost per day on this page assumes one dropper. At two droppers a day, each pack lasts half as long and each daily cost doubles.
The page says five nutrients and the label says twenty-three
Five claimed, six described, twenty-three declared
The sales page says the formula "combines a selection of 5 vital nutrients". The same page then describes six ingredients by name.
The label declares twenty-three. That's chromium on its own plus 22 inside the blend.
Five, six and twenty-three can't all describe the same bottle. The page counts what it wants to talk about. The label counts what's inside.
nohypewellness.com reached the twenty-three item count before we did. We agree with it, and it isn't our discovery.
The gap matters for a practical reason. Most of the 23 get no claim on the page and no amount on the label. You'd be buying them on trust.
Is the bottle 30 ml or 60 ml?
The seller's own pictures disagree about what you get
The illustration at the top of the sales page shows a bottle reading "2 fl oz / 60 ml". Every bottle in the price cards reads "1 fl oz / 30 ml".
The Supplement Facts file is the 30 ml one. It lists 30 servings of 1 ml.
So the label and the pack shots agree on 30 ml. Only the artwork at the top of the page says 60.
We read the files sugarresetheroart.png and 2-frascos-1024x1024.png on 10 October 2026. The 30 servings only fit the smaller bottle.
Check the size on the bottle you receive. The seller's pictures don't settle it.
Which site is the real SugarReset official website?
Six look-alike domains, and none of them is the seller's
We searched Bing US for "sugarreset official website" on 10 October 2026. That's what a buyer hunting for the real site would type.
Page one returned four domains. A search for the brand added two more. None of the six is forsugarreset.com.
| Search | Lookalike domains returned | The seller's domain? |
|---|---|---|
| "sugarreset official website" | 4, each a close variant of the brand name | None |
| The brand name | 2 more of the same kind | None |
The link on our buttons goes to the seller's order page on forsugarreset.com. That's the domain the seller's own link uses.
We didn't assess what the six sites sell. We only noted that none is the domain the seller uses.
One misspelled letter lands you on a different address. Check the address bar before you enter a card number.
Our scam page goes through what is checkable and what isn't.
What else the sales page asks you to believe
A timer, a statistic, three testimonials and six bonuses
A countdown that resets. A timer reading 29:51 appears three times on the page. It resets on reload. The page also says "DON'T WASTE TIME, DO YOUR SUGAR RESET ORDER BEFORE STOCK RUNS OUT". It shows no stock level to back that up.
A statistic with no source. The page says "96% Of Customers Orders 6 Bottles (Our Recommended Option)". It names no survey and no count.
Testimonials that carry two labels. Three testimonials come from Michael Thompson of Houston, Sarah Rodriguez of Chicago and Lauren Rio of Seattle. Each carries a Verified Purchase badge. The footer says some names "have been changed to protect individuals' privacy".
All three describe managing type 2 diabetes. The page's own disclaimer says the product isn't intended to treat any disease. The page can't hold both.
An empty reference list. A Scientific References heading sits in the footer. Nothing is under it. There's no PubMed link, no journal and no study. That's zero references.
Six bonuses. The headline reads "Order 6 Bottles or 3 Bottles and Get 6 FREE Bonuses". The claimed value is $320, and all six are digital downloads.
| Bonus | Claimed value |
|---|---|
| Diabetes Freedom | $67 |
| Fortifying Vitamins | $49 |
| Accelerated Metabolism | $59 |
| Nerve Renew Guide | $67 |
| Glycemic Rebalance Challenge | $39 |
| Personalized Usage Guide | $39 |
| Total claimed | $320 |
The total adds up. The sixth bonus promises "the best times for sublingual absorption". The label says to place the dose in the mouth and swallow.
The bonuses carry a value, not a result. A guide is only as good as the claim behind it.
How much does SugarReset cost?
Three packs, correct per-bottle sums, and a guarantee that opens on day 30
We read the three pack cards on 10 October 2026. Prices are in US dollars as the seller lists them.
Per-day figures divide each total, plus shipping where charged, by the days at one dropper a day. We may earn a commission on these buttons. The three and six bottle packs also carry six digital bonuses, claimed value $320.
The two-bottle pack costs the most a day and risks the least money. The six-bottle pack is cheapest a day, and its 180 days outlast the guarantee. At two droppers a day, every pack lasts half as long.
Two products that print every amount
What disclosure costs, priced the same day
We priced two products from their own makers on 10 October 2026. Both print an amount for every ingredient. They're different products from SugarReset, so this shows what a printed amount costs and nothing more.
| SugarReset, 6 bottles | SugarReset, 2 bottles | NOW Foods Chromium Picolinate 200 mcg | Thorne Berberine | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price | $294 | $167.99 with shipping | $8.99 | $39.60 |
| Size | 6 bottles, 30 servings each | 2 bottles, 30 servings each | 100 veg capsules | 60 capsules, 30 servings |
| Main amount printed | Chromium 0.7 mcg, blend 200 mg | Chromium 0.7 mcg, blend 200 mg | 200 mcg chromium from 1,835 mcg chromium picolinate, 571% DV | 450 mg berberine HCl plus 550 mg berberine phytosome per serving |
| Days | 180 | 60 | 100 | 30 |
| Cost a day | $1.63 | $2.80 | $0.09 | $1.32 |
| Every amount printed | No | No | Yes | Yes |
| Ingredients in the formula | 23 declared | 23 declared | 1 | 2 |
NOW Foods costs nine cents a day. Its 200 mcg of chromium is the exact dose the trial's lower arm used.
Thorne prints every amount at $1.32 a day. That's less per day than every SugarReset pack, the six-bottle pack at $1.63 included.
This isn't a recommendation. A chromium capsule and a berberine capsule are different products from a 23-ingredient liquid. The table shows what a printed amount looks like.
Where it falls short, and what's fair to say
Four real drawbacks, and the credits that hold up
Chromium is declared at 0.7 mcg against 200 to 1,000 mcg. Every herb's trial dose is bigger than the whole blend.
About 9 mg each if the split were even. The label prints no amount for any of the 22.
The badge says 60 days. The body text says at least 30 days of use first. The 90 and 180 day packs outlast it.
The main page strikes through $179 and claims $200 off, a real $21. Two bottles last 30 days at two droppers.
Where it falls short
- Chromium sits 286 times under the trial's lower arm.
- 22 ingredients share 200 mg with no amount for any of them.
- The refund window runs from day 30 to day 60. The page is silent on shipping and return postage.
- The main page's saving is $21, not $200, and the bottle size differs between pictures.
What's in its favor
- A published label with a checkable chromium figure.
- No customer counter and no bottles-left counter.
- Correct per-bottle sums, and an order page whose savings add up.
- Ingredients with real trials behind them.
- Free US shipping on the three and six bottle packs.
Who should buy SugarReset, and who should skip it?
A quick way to sort yourself into one list or the other
It might suit you if you're comfortable taking the seller's word on a 200 mg blend. You'd also want to check the bottle size on arrival. The two-bottle pack puts the least money at stake.
Skip it if you want doses that match the trials. Skip it if you want an amount for every ingredient. Skip it if you hoped it would stand in for something a doctor prescribed.
Our side effects page sets out the warnings in more detail.
How we checked the label and the claims
Five checks, in the order we ran them
Open the sales page and the order page. Read the pack cards, guarantee and footer.
Open the Supplement Facts artwork. Note every amount it prints.
Search Europe PMC for each named ingredient and each trial dose.
Multiply each saving, add shipping and divide by the days at one dropper.
Search Bing US for the official site and check each domain against the seller's.
Why did we score SugarReset 2 out of 10?
What earned its two points, and what cost it the rest
Its only points come from publishing a panel at all. Most sellers here don't. That earns 2 out of 4 for disclosure. The panel discloses one nutrient. It hides 22 inside a 200 mg blend.
Two other credits earn nothing on our scale. The sums per bottle are right. The page carries no customer counter and no bottles-left counter.
Dosing scores 0 out of 3. That costs the most. The one disclosed amount, 0.7 mcg of chromium, sits 286 times under the trial's lower arm. Every herb's trial dose is bigger than the entire 200 mg blend.
Money back scores 0 out of 2. The guarantee badge says 60 days. The body text says use it 30 days first. So the real window runs from day 30 to day 60. Both multi-bottle packs outlast it.
Honesty scores 0 out of 1. The seller's two pages print different crossed-out prices for the same two-bottle pack. Both make the same saving claim. The main page claims $200 off and gives $21.
A few more marks sit outside the score. Two bottles last 30 days at two droppers, not 60. The page says five nutrients, describes six and the label declares twenty-three. Two pictures show two bottle sizes.
The ginseng is aerial extract sold as "an ancient root". Maca has no randomised blood-sugar trial that we found. The references heading has nothing under it.
We carry the counterweight too. Green tea moves fasting glucose by about 1.44 mg/dL at proper doses. That's real and small.
A low score isn't a claim that the product is harmful. It reflects what you can check against what you're asked to believe.
Four changes would lift it. Print the amount of every ingredient in the blend. Fix the crossed-out price on the main page. State whether shipping is refunded. Make the guarantee badge and the body text agree.
Questions buyers ask before they order
Short answers, each traceable to something on this page
What is SugarReset?
A liquid blood-sugar supplement in a 30 ml dropper bottle, sold on forsugarreset.com through BuyGoods. The label declares twenty-three ingredients.
How much does SugarReset cost?
Two bottles cost $158 plus $9.99 shipping. Three cost $207 and six cost $294, both with free US shipping. That's $2.80, $2.30 and $1.63 a day at one dropper.
What does the SugarReset label say?
It declares chromium at 0.7 mcg and a 200 mg blend of 22 ingredients. It prints no amount for any ingredient inside the blend.
Does SugarReset work?
The seller cites no studies, and its references heading is empty. The trials behind the named ingredients used doses bigger than the whole 200 mg blend.
Is the SugarReset money-back guarantee real?
Every card says 60 days. The body text asks for at least 30 days of use first. So the window runs from day 30 to day 60. The page doesn't say whether shipping is refunded.
Is forsugarreset.com the official SugarReset website?
It's the domain the seller's link uses. Bing US returned six look-alike domains, and none of them is forsugarreset.com.
How long does a bottle of SugarReset last?
It holds 30 servings of 1 ml. That's 30 days at one dropper and 15 days at two droppers. The label allows both.
Is SugarReset safe to take?
We can't judge safety from a blend with no published amounts. The label tells pregnant or nursing mothers to consult a physician. It says the same to under 18s and anyone with a known condition.
How we reviewed this
- Read the seller's sales page and the order page on 10 October 2026, pack cards and footer included.
- Read the Supplement Facts artwork on the seller's page at full resolution.
- Queried Europe PMC for each named ingredient, and searched for a maca blood-sugar trial.
- Searched Bing US for the official website and for the brand name.
- Priced NOW Foods and Thorne from each maker's own page the same day.
- We didn't buy the product, taste it or use it, and we haven't requested a refund. This is desk analysis of what the seller publishes and what the research shows. We invented no customer stories.
If a price or policy has changed since 10 October 2026, tell us through the contact page. We'll add a dated correction.
That link goes to the seller's own site. We earn a commission if you buy, at no extra cost to you, and it never changes what we write. Our full review has the score and the verdict.
This page is information, not medical advice. Statements about supplements have not been evaluated by the FDA.